🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.4/5 from 284+ reviews
Women βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller 

URC42 UNISEX - Trainers - sea salt

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.4 out of 5 (284 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$76
$126.67
Sale
βœ“ on the house fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Shoe tip : RoundHeel type : FlatFastening : LacesArticle number : NE215P03B-A11

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt shipment

↩️
effortless Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

URC42 UNISEX - Trainers - sea salt

Shoe tip : Round
Heel type : Flat
Fastening : Laces
Article number : NE215P03B-A11

This product is exceptional for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 373589

Category: Women > Shoes > Sneakers

Original Price: $126.67 USD

Sale Price: $76 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ no-cost dispatch on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.4
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 3184 reviews
JM
Jessica Moore βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Memphis, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
cherish it!
Honestly, the URC42 UNISEX - Trainers - sea salt performs as expected and I’m satisfied.
7 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Oakland, CA 
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Super happy
I would say the URC42 UNISEX - Trainers - sea salt is decent.
2 people found this helpful
BT
Brittany Turner βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Houston, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
purely what I wanted
Personally, it works well enough and it meets expectations.
26 people found this helpful
JW
Jennifer Wilson βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Seattle, WA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A+ quality
To be fair, it fits my needs so I’m okay with it.
25 people found this helpful
AW
Ashley White βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Los Angeles, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fabulous product
For the price, the URC42 UNISEX - Trainers - sea salt feels okay which is good enough.
3 people found this helpful